In this lab you will modify YFS to cache extents, reducing the load on the extent server and improving YFS performance. The main challenge is to ensure consistency of extents cached at different yfs_clients: to make sure that each yfs_client sees extent data that reflects the latest modifications by other clients. To achieve consistency we will use the caching lock service from Lab 4.
First you‘ll add a local write-back extent cache to each extent client. The extent client will serve all extent operations from this cache; the extent client will contact the extent server only to fetch an extent (or the attribute of the extent) that is not present on the client. Then you‘ll make the caches at different clients consistent by forcing write-back of the dirty cached extent associated with a filehandle (and deletion of the clean extent) when you release the lock on that filehandle.
Your client will be a success if it manages to operate out of its local extent and lock cache when reading/writing files and directories that other hosts aren‘t looking at, but maintains correctness when the same files and directories are concurrently read and updated by multiple clients.
Begin by initializing your Lab 5 branch with your implementation from Lab 4. There is no new code for this lab, except for an update to the makefile to build this lab.
% cd ~/lab % git commit -am ‘my solution to lab4‘ Created commit ... % git pull remote: Generating pack... ... % git checkout -b lab5 origin/lab5 Branch lab5 set up to track remote branch refs/remotes/origin/lab5. Switched to a new branch "lab5" % git merge lab4
Our measure of performance is the number of put and get RPCs that your extent server receives. You can tell the extent server to print out a line every 25 RPCs telling you the current totals as you did for the lock server in Lab 4, by setting RPC_COUNT to 25.
Then you can start the servers, run the test-lab-3-c tester, and look in extent_server.log to see how many RPCs have been received.
% export RPC_COUNT=25 % ./start.sh % ./test-lab-3-c ./yfs1 ./yfs2 Create/delete in separate directories: tests completed OK % grep "RPC STATS" extent_server.log ... RPC STATS: 1:2 6001:804 6002:2218 6003:1878 6004:198 % ./stop.sh
The RPC STATS line indicates the number of bind, put, get, getattr, and remove RPCs received by the extent server. The above line is the output of our solution for Lab 4. Your goal is to reduce those numbers to about a dozen puts and at most a few hundred gets.
In Step One you‘ll add caching to your extent client, without cache consistency. This cache will make your yfs_client fast but inconsistent.
Your new extent_client::get should check if the extent is cached, and if so return the cached copy. Otherwise get() should fetch the extent from the extent server, put it in the local cache, and then return it. put() should just replace the cached copy, and not send it to the extent server. You‘ll find it helpful for the next section if you keep track of which cached extents have been modified by put() (i.e., are "dirty"). remove() should delete the extent from the local cache. extent_client should maintain cached attributes for each extent so thatextent_client::getattr() returns reasonable values.
When you‘re done, set RPC_COUNT and run test-lab-3-c giving the same directory twice, and watch the RPC STATS printed by the extent server. You should see zero puts and somewhere between zero and a few hundred gets (or perhaps no numbers at all, if the value of RPC_COUNT is more than the number of gets). Your server should pass test-lab-3-a.pl and test-lab-3-b if you give it the same directory twice, but it will probably fail test-lab-3-b with two different directories because it has no cache consistency.
You can modify extent_client.cc and extent_client.h, or if you‘d like, you can add the code to a sub-class in a separate file. Remember to git add any new files you create.
In Step Two you‘ll ensure that each get() sees the latest put(), even when the get() and put() are from different YFS clients. The extent client and lock client will cooperate to do this, helped by the yfs_client using the same ID for a file/directory i-number, lock, and extent. When your lock client releases a lock back to the lock server, you should ensure that the extent client first flush the extent to the server, and then remove it from local cache. A flush requires putting the corresponding extent (if dirty) to the extent server, or removing the extent (if locally removed) from the extent server.
Suppose client A acquires the lock on an i-number, get()s the file‘s data from the extent server and modifies it in its extent client cache, and keeps the lock and extent cached. Client B then asks for the lock, so that the lock server sends client A a revoke message. Client A will send the dirty data back to the extent server before releasing the lock. Then B will acquire the lock and get() the i-number‘s extent. Since B cannot have the extent in its cache (if it ever cached it, it must have deleted it when it gave up the lock), and A wrote the modified extent to the extent server before releasing the lock, B will see A‘s modifications.
You will now be using locks for two different purposes: first, to ensure that each file system operation is atomic; second, to drive the extent cache consistency scheme. This may mean that you have to add acquires and releases to yfs_client that were not necessary to pass the tests for the previous labs. Ensure that every yfs_client call to get(eid), put(eid), getattr(eid), and remove(eid) is wrapped in acquire(eid)/release(eid).
Add a method to the extent client to eliminate an extent from the cache. This flush() method should first check whether the extent is dirty in the cache, in which case it should send it to the extent server. If the extent has been removed (with the extent client‘s remove() method), flush() should send a remove RPC to the server. extent_client should cache attributes fetched from the server, and invalidate the relevant attributes in flush(). You need not explicitly send dirty attributes to the extent server; instead, it is enough to let the server update the attributes as a side-effect of flush() sending a put RPC for a dirty extent.
Your YFS server should call flush() just before releasing a lock back to the lock server. You could just add flush() calls to yfs_client.cc before each release(). However, now that your lock client handles the caching of locks, flushing an extent in lock_client::release() is overkill; you only have to flush an extent when the lock server revokes the corresponding lock.
We provide you with a bit of glue to connect the lock client to the extent client in the form of the lock_release_user class, defined in lock_client_cache.h. This is a virtual class supporting only one method: dorelease(lock_protocol::lockid_t). Your job is to subclass lock_release_user and implement that subclass‘s dorelease method to callflush() on your extent client for whatever data is about to lose its lock. Then, create an instance of this class and pass it into the lock_client_cache object constructed in yfs_client.cc. Finally, your lock_client_cache must call the dorelease() method of its lu object before it releases a lock back to the lock server. (Note that lu was defined and initialized in the code we provided you for Lab 4.) This will ensure that lock_client::flush() is called before the lock is released.
When you‘re done with Step Two your server should pass all the correctness tests (test-lab-3-a.pl, test-lab-3-b, and test-lab-3-c should execute correctly with two separate YFS directories), and you should see a dramatic drop in the number of puts and gets received by the extent server.
问题：
1. 程序的架构是什么，有些模糊了。为什么需要 lock_release_user， yfs_client变得非常复杂，各个变量之间的关系很不清晰
6.824 Lab 5: Caching Extents,布布扣,bubuko.com
原文：http://www.cnblogs.com/xinsheng/p/3837751.html