首页 > 编程语言 > 详细

Python 学习笔记(3)

时间:2014-08-09 09:02:47      阅读:301      评论:0      收藏:0      [点我收藏+]

Class:

 

def scope_test():
    def do_local():
        spam = "local spam"
    def do_nonlocal():
        nonlocal spam
        spam = "nonlocal spam"
    def do_global():
        global spam
        spam = "global spam"
    spam = "test spam"
    do_local()
    print("After local assignment:", spam)
    do_nonlocal()
    print("After nonlocal assignment:", spam)
    do_global()
    print("After global assignment:", spam)

scope_test()
print("In global scope:", spam)

The output of the example code is:

After local assignment: test spam
After nonlocal assignment: nonlocal spam
After global assignment: nonlocal spam
In global scope: global spam


class MyClass:
    """A simple example class"""
    i = 12345
    def f(self):
        return ‘hello world‘


So in our example, x.f is a valid method reference, since MyClass.f is a function, but x.i is not, since MyClass.i is not. But x.f is not the same thing as MyClass.f — it is a method object, not a function object.

In our example, the call x.f() is exactly equivalent to MyClass.f(x). In general, calling a method with a list of n arguments is equivalent to calling the corresponding function with an argument list that is created by inserting the method’s object before the first argument.

 

 

shared data can have possibly surprising effects with involving mutableobjects such as lists and dictionaries. For example, the tricks list in the following code should not be used as a class variable because just a single list would be shared by all Dog instances:

class Dog:

    tricks = []             # mistaken use of a class variable

    def __init__(self, name):
        self.name = name

    def add_trick(self, trick):
        self.tricks.append(trick)

>>> d = Dog(‘Fido‘)
>>> e = Dog(‘Buddy‘)
>>> d.add_trick(‘roll over‘)
>>> e.add_trick(‘play dead‘)
>>> d.tricks                # unexpectedly shared by all dogs
[‘roll over‘, ‘play dead‘]

Correct design of the class should use an instance variable instead:

class Dog:

    def __init__(self, name):
        self.name = name
        self.tricks = []    # creates a new empty list for each dog

    def add_trick(self, trick):
        self.tricks.append(trick)

>>> d = Dog(‘Fido‘)
>>> e = Dog(‘Buddy‘)
>>> d.add_trick(‘roll over‘)
>>> e.add_trick(‘play dead‘)
>>> d.tricks
[‘roll over‘]
>>> e.tricks
[‘play dead‘]


Python 学习笔记(3),布布扣,bubuko.com

Python 学习笔记(3)

原文:http://www.cnblogs.com/wintor12/p/3900492.html

(0)
(0)
   
举报
评论 一句话评论(0
关于我们 - 联系我们 - 留言反馈 - 联系我们:wmxa8@hotmail.com
© 2014 bubuko.com 版权所有
打开技术之扣,分享程序人生!