首页 > 编程语言 > 详细

两种查找算法的比较

时间:2019-04-18 01:00:33      阅读:154      评论:0      收藏:0      [点我收藏+]
原文:两种查找算法的比较

1、普通查找:双层循环遍历,第二层循环中找到即break,查找时间复杂度O(M*N/2)

技术分享图片
List<PtCameraInfo> cameraList = new List<PtCameraInfo>();
List<string> cameraIdList = dataIds.Split(,).ToList();
List<PtCameraInfo> oldList = this.cameraList.Cameras.ToList();

for (int i = 0; i < cameraIdList.Count; i++)
{
    string cameraId = cameraIdList[i];
    for (int j = 0; j < _cameraList.Count; j++)
    {
        PtCameraInfo camera = _cameraList[j];
        if (camera.ID == cameraId && !oldList.Exists(a => a.ID == camera.ID))
        {
            cameraList.Add(camera);
            break;
        }
    }
}
View Code

2、高效查找:排序虽然费时,但数量级低,所以耗时很低,排序时间复杂度O(M*logM+N*logN),查找过程也是双层循环,但第二层循环比较省时,查找时间复杂度O(M*logN),总的时间复杂度:O(M*logM+N*logN+M*logN)

技术分享图片
List<PtCameraInfo> cameraList = new List<PtCameraInfo>();
List<string> cameraIdList = dataIds.Split(,).ToList();
List<PtCameraInfo> oldList = this.cameraList.Cameras.ToList();

//排序
this._cameraList.Sort(new Comparison<PtCameraInfo>((a, b) =>
{
    return string.Compare(a.ID.PadLeft(36, 0), b.ID.PadLeft(36, 0));
}));
cameraIdList.Sort((a, b) =>
{
    return string.Compare(a.PadLeft(36, 0), b.PadLeft(36, 0));
});

//高效查找
int k = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < cameraIdList.Count; i++)
{
    string cameraId = cameraIdList[i];
    for (int j = k; j < _cameraList.Count; j++)
    {
        PtCameraInfo camera = _cameraList[j];
        if (camera.ID == cameraId && !oldList.Exists(a => a.ID == camera.ID))
        {
            cameraList.Add(camera);
            k = j;
            break;
        }
    }
}
View Code

说明:cameraList的数量级是2万,当cameraIdList数量从1到大约1000时,高效查找耗时始终是0.1秒多左右,而普通查找,当cameraIdList数量很少时,很快,0.05秒,当cameraIdList数量接近1000时,大约2秒。

两种查找算法的比较

原文:https://www.cnblogs.com/lonelyxmas/p/10726999.html

(0)
(0)
   
举报
评论 一句话评论(0
关于我们 - 联系我们 - 留言反馈 - 联系我们:wmxa8@hotmail.com
© 2014 bubuko.com 版权所有
打开技术之扣,分享程序人生!