1. ENABLE DEVELOPER PRODUCTIVITY
? Do you want to give developers the freedom to innovate using the best tool for the job?
? Does your vendor choice limit your developers’ choices?
? Do application development choices complicate your infrastructure operations?
? Do you want to support new languages that reduce development time?
? Do you want the agility of cloud but on developers’ local laptops?
If you answered “yes” to any of these questions, you should consider an open source cloud-native platform. Maintaining flexible tools gives your developers the choice they need to succeed.
2. CAPITALIZE ON EXISTING INVESTMENTS
? Do you continue to invest in more infrastructure while you have under-utilized capacity?
? Do long delivery times for existing applications negatively impact your organization?
? Do you need public cloud agility for your existing legacy applications?
? Are existing applications excluded from your DevOps initiative?
? Do you want infrastructure portability for your existing applications?
? Do you consider modernizing existing applications but are interested in an incremental, side-by side approach?
? Does your existing middleware support DevOps and microservices principles?
If you answered “yes” to any of these questions, you should evaluate full-stack vendors that have an open philosophy. These vendors will allow you to use your existing knowledge base, offer your developers choice, and provide confidence in the security of your container platform.
3. MAXIMIZE FUTURE CHOICE
? Does vendor lock-in concern you?
? Do you want the ability to move applications across multiple cloud infrastructures?
? Does your environment support development, test, and production for multiple application development life-cycle stages?
? Do you want to adopt modern application architectures without changing your current infrastructure?
? Do you want the speed of microservices without the management complexity?
? Do you see serverless architecture as an alternative for future applications?
If you answered “yes” to any of these questions, it is important to confirm that your cloud-native platform is actually open (and not a mix of open and proprietary solutions) and based on widely adopted industry standards. True application portability will allow you to maintain control of your environment.
4. MAKE SECURITY A TOP PRIORITY
? Is multitenancy a key element of your enterprise architecture?
? Do you want to give developers a choice of technology but are concerned about the security risks?
? Does security from malicious users or poorly written code cause concerns in your current environment?
? Do you need the security assurances of tested and proven technologies?
? Do you want proactive security tools that inform your teams about security vulnerabilities before the public does?
? Does your technology stack enable rapid security response to viral vulnerabilities?
? Do you want to adopt containers and Kubernetes but are concerned about security assurance and longevity?
If you answered “yes” to any of these questions, you should evaluate whether a cloud-native platform will keep your applications and IT infrastructure secure—and determine if that security will work throughout your stack.
如有想了解更多软件设计与架构, 系统IT,企业信息化, 团队管理 资讯，请关注我的微信订阅号：
作者：Petter Liu
出处：http://www.cnblogs.com/wintersun/
本文版权归作者和博客园共有，欢迎转载，但未经作者同意必须保留此段声明，且在文章页面明显位置给出原文连接，否则保留追究法律责任的权利。
该文章也同时发布在我的独立博客中-Petter Liu Blog。
原文：https://www.cnblogs.com/wintersun/p/13655889.html